Every so often I come across a document that literally makes my heart sink at the thought that those in high positions of office are running our country to its death….literally! It’s also times like these that I’m proud to do my job by getting the message to the public. With more evidence bubbling to the surface it is almost hard not to believe the heinous agenda planned by those in leadership.
Today, I stumbled across a report put out by the National Academy of Science called, Human population reduction is not a quick fix for environmental problems. This report envisions a one-child policy law globally as well as decreasing the population down to the “sustainable” size of 1-2 billion persons, here are a few quotes from the report:
“There have been repeated calls for rapid action to reduce the world population humanely over the coming decades to centuries… Amoral wars and global pandemics aside, the only humane way to reduce the size of the human population is to encourage lower per capita fertility.”
“The more draconian fertility reduction to a global one child per woman by 2100 resulted in a peak population size of 8.9 billion in 2056, followed by a decline to ∼7 billion by 2100.”
The sad truth is these weren’t the only demented, disturbing, distraught quotes coming from this report…there were many, many more!
In the video below I not only dive into the truth contained in this report but also the hidden agenda behind the White House Science Czar…
When Obama designated John P. Holdren as his Science Czar he declared “promoting science isn’t just about providing resources” but “ensuring that facts and evidence are never twisted or obscured by politics or ideology.” His words could scarcely have a more Orwellian ring.
John Holdren, a globalists who endorses the surrender of sovereignty, a Planetary Regime, redistribution of wealth, and depopulation through sterilization, couldn’t be a more dangerous man to have as an advisor to our president. In 1977 he wrote a book called Ecoscience that he co-authored with his colleagues Paul and Anne Ehrlich (who themselves are major depopulation advocates). In this book he discusses just that. Here are a few clippings of its contents….
Page 837: Required abortions would be legal…
“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
Page 786: Single mothers should have their babies taken away or be forced to have abortions
“One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”
Page 787-788: Mass sterilization though drugs in the water supply as long as it doesn’t hurt livestock
“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”
Page 786-787: Government control of women’s reproduction through sterilization or birth control
Involuntary fertility control
“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”
Page 838: Those who are unfit for society should not be allowed to have children
“If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.“
Page 942-3: A “Planetary Regime” to control the world and dictate by force how many kids you can have
Toward a Planetary Regime
“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”
“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
Page 838: Government dictating family size
“In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?”
For More Information See:
National Academy of Science Document: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/10/23/1410465111
National Academy of Science Link to Government: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DEPS/DEPS_037300
J.P. Holdren’s Book Clips: http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/